3 ms·
the point of the article is that this is what the author thought was the case, but not what actually appears to be the case -- e.g. it seems that Krugman's inte
by xixi77 11y ago
the point of the article is that this is what the author thought was the case, but not what actually appears to be the case -- e.g. it seems that Krugman's interpretation of the same Card & Krueger evidence has changed, as opposed to him changing his view based on new empirical evidence available since then (which is quite messy and inconclusive, tbh).
- bandrami 11y agoIn physics, when a new study is released physicists don't change their opinions overnight. There's a big difference in how a scientist treats a study that was recently released and one that has survived a decade or so.