4 ms·
Absolutely, we're more concerned w/ use-cases vs. Docker itself. PhantomJS is a great tool, and we're using it to show off the platform which hosts this sort of
by pea 11y ago
Absolutely, we're more concerned w/ use-cases vs. Docker itself. PhantomJS is a great tool, and we're using it to show off the platform which hosts this sort of stuff in the cloud (with Docker!). Would love to get some more feedback: leo@stackhut.com :)
- stephenr 11y agoIf it's just for taking screenshots I'm curious why you chose phantom rather than say wkhtmltoimage/pdf? I've used phantom (via Casper) for some scraping tools but for images I would have thought the wkhtmlto* project was simpler?
- pea 11y agoHey Stephen -- Honestly, it was just what I had more experience using; I always presumed Phantom is more consistent and malleable, albeit sometimes a pain to configure. You are definitely right on the simplicity aspect. We're aiming to extend it past basic screenshotting -- is there any functionality you'd like to see? (moreover, are there any other services we could chuck on the platform that you'd like to see?) Link to GH issues here, too: https://github.com/StackHut/phantomjs/issues https://github.com/StackHut/phantomjs/issues
- stephenr 11y agoPersonally? No. I specifically don't use hosted services wherever I can self-host. My interest was purely technical, rather than about a specific use-case I had in mind.