2 ms·
1: Correct, though since the majority of jobs, infrastructure, and population gravitates around urban areas, building further infrastructure near populated area
by nosuchthing 11y ago
1: Correct, though since the majority of jobs, infrastructure, and population gravitates around urban areas, building further infrastructure near populated areas would be reasonable.
2: Why do societies agree to build and maintain public infrastructure projects like sanitation, water, roads, schools, etc?
There will always be the economy of WANTs, buy a house wherever you want!
Consider the excessive amount of tax money going into the Prison Industrial Complex economy, it seems a much better option to build low cost / public housing infrastructure and job training rather than prisons.
- cmdrfred 11y ago1: So, basically people who live in rural areas will subsidize the people who live in cities? Or will they just pay much lower taxes? 2: Sanitation? I have my own septic system. Water? Well. Roads? You mean the gravel thing that has tons of pot holes? It would not be feasible for me to do that alone. (private property and all) Schools? Tell me how much a high school degree gets you in today's economy? I just don't see much ROI there. I agree about the prison system, it should only have violent criminals and thieves but the savings should go to lower taxes for the poor and middle class.