4 ms·
Except, I think this is actually somewhat an example of what the author is saying, because when I click around links: * Support * Guides * Login * Blog are
by themgt 11y ago
Except, I think this is actually somewhat an example of what the author is saying, because when I click around links:
* Support
* Guides
* Login
* Blog
are all outside the SPA, and some appear to be MPA apps. And perhaps once I logged in that would be its own new app as well?
So in that sense, your website in not an SPA, you have an app for getting new signups which is an SPA, and then you have a bunch of other SPA or MPA apps hooked up to that. As the author said, "Websites can still have Rich User Interfaces without cramming the entire site into one document."
I think the point is to find a balance and realize building your entire infrastructure into an SPA will indeed break the web and your user's experience, most likely. Having a mix of SPA/MPA apps that cover the various functionality you need, and using each where appropriate, is a much better use of resources and results in a better UX.
- stevedomin 11y agoYou are right, we have multiple applications, it makes it way easier to maintain them. It would be a nightmare if everything (splash pages, dashboard, blog and any other app you can have) was bundled into a single application, be it SPA or MPA. Agree, it's all about the user's experience for us, we use whatever tool we feel enable us to build the best UX (without breaking the web).