3 ms·
Earthquakes are, for now, impossible to predict so there is little forewarning (and not for the lack of people trying). However, there is a huge interest in the
by cossatot 11y ago
Earthquakes are, for now, impossible to predict so there is little forewarning (and not for the lack of people trying). However, there is a huge interest in the geological/hazards community in earthquake early warning systems in the US, especially focused on California[1][2]. The Napa earthquake last summer was the first real test of the more modern components and was successful. But again, you're dependent on warning the populace after the earthquake has begun, which isn't useful for people near the epicenter.
Tsunami warning systems have been in place for many places for decades; whether people respond is a different story.
In terms of people preparedness, again, California is the leader in the US but there are drills in many places[3], though they're generally voluntary and totally ignored by most.
[1]: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/earlywarning/ http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/earlywarning/
[2]: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-lanow-ln-earthquake-earlywarning-system-gave-10second-alert-before-napa-quake-felt-20140824-story.html http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-lanow-ln-earthquake...
[3]
- astrodust 11y agoIt takes measurable time for communities miles away from the epicentre to get hit, and in that time you could easily send a warning. Many of the videos from the Japan tsunami showed people getting alerted well before the quake hit. All TV stations flipped over to a warning screen with information on the quake and a map of tsunami danger areas based on computed projections. I can see how having the fault line directly under your city is a problem, but this "mega quake" is projected to originate off-shore. I guess the US solution is to keep watching Twitter.