2 ms·
Regarding the second issue, Griggs v. Duke Power Co. asserted that requiring a high-school degree for a job that arguably didn't strictly require one was discri
by murbard2 11y ago
Regarding the second issue, Griggs v. Duke Power Co. asserted that requiring a high-school degree for a job that arguably didn't strictly require one was discriminatory because it could act as a proxy to race.
If the author is on board with height, I can take him down all the way to a reductio where you give everyone the exact same credit terms.
- theseatoms 11y agoWell hopefully that case doesn't hold too much power via legal precedent, which is a concept I never fully understood. I can very much appreciate your reductio argument, but if i had to wager, that's the way we're headed. Seems like aspiring lawyers should start cracking open the ML textbooks, because that case is a pandora's box.