5 ms·
Thanks for the great info. We are ~10Km from the nearest village that likely has decent bandwidth, though no idea on the backhaul available from there. Still
by aquark 11y ago
Thanks for the great info.
We are ~10Km from the nearest village that likely has decent bandwidth, though no idea on the backhaul available from there.
Still 10K @ $30 (AUD/CAD)\m would be $300K+ to put it along existing hydro infrastructure. Wonder what the likelihood of getting 100 households to put up say $3-5K in installation costs would be? That would represent a decent fraction of those reachable along that stretch, and those nearer in may already have DSL.
- shoo 11y agoVery crudely, you might want to multiply that $300k guesstimate by a factor of 2 or 3 to take into account the cost of cabling off the main stretch, splicing, splitters, installing "lead-ins" / "drops" to each household, etc. Although if you were only serving a hundred households you could plausibly serve them all from a single large fibre cable along the main stretch by "pulling off" a couple of fibres into a smaller cable per household. This wouldn't require any optical splitting gear, so that might make things a bit cheaper. For reference, the overall construction costs for Australia's FTTH rollout was somewhere around AUD$1000 - AUD$2000 / premises -- probably toward the high end of that scale, but the order of magnitude is right. This would underestimate the cost for a semi-rural area. In Australia's project they use fixed wireless / satellite for some areas where FTTx was not cost-effective. Another thing to keep in mind is the maximum optical path distance -- from memory this is probably somewhere around the 20km mark from the exchange, probably a bit less, will depend upon the technology used. That still gives you a ~10km buffer region of potentially reachable households around your main fibre-atop-hydro stretch.