4 ms·
>Still, actually, HN should define OP -- I still don't have a good source to know what it means and have been only guessing. So it's HN's fault, not yours, tha
by prof_hobart 11y ago
>Still, actually, HN should define OP -- I still don't have a good source to know what it means and have been only guessing.
So it's HN's fault, not yours, that you didn't define a term that you chose to use?
And you're using a term that you don't know what it means?
> I should be torqued at it, and I am
What is "torqued" meant to mean in this context? I know what torque means, but it makes no sense when applied to this sentence.