It's funny that a writer for the New York Times is apparently tainted because he held an AMA. An AMA which he held deliberately vague and where he made various

It's funny that a writer for the New York Times is apparently tainted because he held an AMA. An AMA which he held deliberately vague and where he made various of the claims that critics of "GamerGate" make to begin with, for which he was amply downvoted at times: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_mike_isaac_the_new_york_times_reporter/csz7nt3 https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_m... https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_mike_isaac_the_new_york_times_reporter/cszag9b https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_m... https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_mike_isaac_the_new_york_times_reporter/csz7phw https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3cur16/im_m... Again, what does this say about an ideology that sees someone writing for a giant publication as "tainted" simply for posting in a certain Subreddit, even if he largely agrees with them?