5 ms·

Seems like they(3rd party) haven't found a way to stop piracy and started trying so hard to add malicious code, which may lead to blocking out these websites by

by kp25 11y ago

Seems like they(3rd party) haven't found a way to stop piracy and started trying so hard to add malicious code, which may lead to blocking out these websites by all the major browser vendors and reduce piracy to some extent. The one behind this, You're gonna lose the war.!

stingraycharles 11y ago
This sounds very conspiracy-theory-ish to me. The more likely explanation is that some ad network allowed malware ads to go through which triggered the block.
- Yokohiii 11y ago
  Yup. On top of that it could be a false positive in the malware detection algorithm. Not defeding anyone, ad business is highly volatile, especially in grey areas of the web.
- legulere 11y ago
  Especially when you consider that the ad networks those sites are using are rather sketchy. Many of the ads there try to trick you into believing they're the actual download link
  - Mikushi 11y ago
    Yup. Though if you keep the tinfoil hat on, nothing stop a malicious entity to use those network to funnel malware to those websites through targeting, the security of these ad networks is usually subpar, not too hard to imagine an entity determined enough to figure out an sure way to slip in malware.
  - Wizzard666 11y ago
    just like most adword ads for software, the only sane solution is adblock
  - anon1385 11y ago
    >the ad networks those sites are using are rather sketchy. Many of the ads there try to trick you into believing they're the actual download link If that's your definition of a sketchy ad network then there aren't many that aren't sketchy. Google serves ads that do that all the time. It only took me a few seconds to find this misleading fake download link ad being served by Google on one of the download pages of download.com: http://i.imgur.com/wYAfr7z.png http://i.imgur.com/wYAfr7z.png Would Google blacklist download.com for serving malicious google ads? Somehow I doubt it.
    - rancur 11y ago
      still, considering the mess of code they release every year with new Android versions, empty promises ('smooth as iPhone') where the solutions implemented are things like 'project butter' that cranks the CPU frequency to maximum when you touch the screen to overcome 1. ineffective governor design 2. bloated software; and generally poor design, it still doesn't seem outside the realm of reality that eh, maybe it does.

by kp25 11y ago

stingraycharles 11y ago

This sounds very conspiracy-theory-ish to me. The more likely explanation is that some ad network allowed malware ads to go through which triggered the block.

Yokohiii 11y ago
Yup. On top of that it could be a false positive in the malware detection algorithm. Not defeding anyone, ad business is highly volatile, especially in grey areas of the web.
legulere 11y ago
Especially when you consider that the ad networks those sites are using are rather sketchy. Many of the ads there try to trick you into believing they're the actual download link
- Mikushi 11y ago
  Yup. Though if you keep the tinfoil hat on, nothing stop a malicious entity to use those network to funnel malware to those websites through targeting, the security of these ad networks is usually subpar, not too hard to imagine an entity determined enough to figure out an sure way to slip in malware.
- Wizzard666 11y ago
  just like most adword ads for software, the only sane solution is adblock
- anon1385 11y ago
  >the ad networks those sites are using are rather sketchy. Many of the ads there try to trick you into believing they're the actual download link If that's your definition of a sketchy ad network then there aren't many that aren't sketchy. Google serves ads that do that all the time. It only took me a few seconds to find this misleading fake download link ad being served by Google on one of the download pages of download.com: http://i.imgur.com/wYAfr7z.png http://i.imgur.com/wYAfr7z.png Would Google blacklist download.com for serving malicious google ads? Somehow I doubt it.
  - rancur 11y ago
    still, considering the mess of code they release every year with new Android versions, empty promises ('smooth as iPhone') where the solutions implemented are things like 'project butter' that cranks the CPU frequency to maximum when you touch the screen to overcome 1. ineffective governor design 2. bloated software; and generally poor design, it still doesn't seem outside the realm of reality that eh, maybe it does.