Speaking as someone who is also personally affected, I'm actually disappointed by this move. "Heads rolling" doesn't actually imply that the problem is going to

Speaking as someone who is also personally affected, I'm actually disappointed by this move. "Heads rolling" doesn't actually imply that the problem is going to be fixed, and until she resigned we at least had someone in charge of the agency who was advocating finding and fixing the problems. The flaws that led to this hack existed long before she was sworn in back in November 2013, and we would hardly know about them today if she hadn't been pushing for security audits of their terrible systems. It seems silly that she resigned for uncovering a major security flaw that she was in no way responsible for creating, and I would much rather have meaningful policy and security changes implemented than merely firing the director of the agency.