4 ms·
> And logically, if the poor as a group were good with money, they wouldn't be poor. I am sorry, just this statement alone, disqualifies your whole argumentati
by PythonicAlpha 11y ago
> And logically, if the poor as a group were good with money, they wouldn't be poor.
I am sorry, just this statement alone, disqualifies your whole argumentation. It is just a barroom cliche of the rich.
- thedevil 11y agoSometimes cliches are cliches because they're accurate. And who cares if you think my argument should automatically be "disqualified" because it doesn't match your politics.
- PythonicAlpha 11y ago> Sometimes cliches are cliches because they're accurate. And sometimes they are cliches, because they match into politics of some people. It is always much better to have an argument, why you do better than others, than to admit, that you are lucky. But I guess, you are the one, who knows which ones are "accurate", because you know best. > And who cares if you think my argument should automatically be "disqualified" because it doesn't match your politics. Right. It is better, that your politics matches the politics of the rich and mighty.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- thedevil 11y agoI do help others financially, quite a bit. And actually giving someone money in a way that helps them is a lot different than talking about someone else helping out people. And what's with the childish ad hominem? Do you think you're still in high school?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- Frondo 11y ago(responding to undo an accidental downvote...)