2 ms·
I saw Shane Legg's talk recently and I understood the main idea but I had a question I wish I could ask him: He said general intelligence is 'as long as you pr
by fizixer 11y ago
I saw Shane Legg's talk recently and I understood the main idea but I had a question I wish I could ask him:
He said general intelligence is 'as long as you provide a goal, the intelligence should optimize over that goal based on experience'.
But my problem is: general intelligence is supposed to come up with its own goals.
Take for a example a couch potato who has some steady stream of monthly stipend, and sits in front of tv all day. This person is in possession of a functioning general intelligence yet has no goal. One day this person decides to assign to self a goal of going out and getting a degree and so on and so forth. That's also part of that person's general intelligence.
It's not clear to me that AIXI is self-driven in that sense. It would be great if someone could comment on that.
- dorgo 11y agoI think the idea is to build something usefull (learn from experience and optimize goals)instead of something dangerous (own goals). And I dont think that own goals are a neccessary condition for general inteligence. But it depends on the definition of general intelligence, of course.
- RangerScience 11y agoCheck out my reply on "causal entropic forces". Basically, maximizing future possibilities works really well for intelligence.