> Because I wrote that original post, and I had experiences while writing it. Well I said "a" heartfelt seeming post, not that specific one. If an AI told me t

> Because I wrote that original post, and I had experiences while writing it. Well I said "a" heartfelt seeming post, not that specific one. If an AI told me the same thing, what difference would that make? I have nothing but the word of the author. How do I know you're not just an AI, and does it make any difference if you used neurons or transistors to come up with the concepts expressed? To me, the difference is meaningless. > but rather that they have an experience of a color But what defines that experience? Is it not just a wavelength of light hitting your eye, and your brain interpreting it? I also find it interesting that you addressed the questions that were easy to refute, and left most of them unanswered. I am genuinely curious on your thoughts, as I find your conclusions as mystifying as you find mine. EDIT: > And sure, some people experience fewer colors. Ah, but do they experience fewer colors, or do they experience them differently? Since the wavelength of a color isn't what defines experiencing it, then what does? And surely you can't say they don't experience it just because of the wavelength.