3 ms·
I've used fpm to make rpm and deb packages that simply include a virtualenv, it works ok. One of the significant tradeoffs to this approach is you lose the car
by rhelmer 11y ago
I've used fpm to make rpm and deb packages that simply include a virtualenv, it works ok.
One of the significant tradeoffs to this approach is you lose the carefully-crafted tree-of-dependencies that the distros favor, so it makes the package pretty much automatically unacceptable to package maintainers.
However, being able to have install instructions that amount to "yum/apt-get install <package>" is pretty great.
I am hoping for an app/container convergence at some point, but we might need to drop the fine-grained dependency dream and have them be more self-contained, like Mac OS X apps.
- vacri 11y agoFPM is written as an in-house solution only. It's not intended to be used for making packages for official distro repositories for third-party users to pick up, and they suggest you use the distro-specified methods for those.