3 ms·
And then you go to court and ask a judge, who is (in general) a neutral party, to interpret the law based on the situation and ask what the correct course of ac
by charlesdm 11y ago
And then you go to court and ask a judge, who is (in general) a neutral party, to interpret the law based on the situation and ask what the correct course of action was.
I guess people have different definitions of evasion, but I would probably define it as having the intent to evade taxes "from the start". As a citizen (or a corporation), you are free to decide on your own interpretation of the law. Tax authorities (around the globe) aren't always right. Hence you ask a judge, because an interpretation is just that: an interpretation. It's not the law. And the law is the only thing that counts.
- tanderson92 11y ago> I would probably define it as... The legal standard for proving tax evasion disagrees with you.
- charlesdm 11y agoWell, then you just need to make sure your interpretation of the law is more correct than the one of the administration. :-) Innocent until proven guilty?