> Why are we not talking about Dr. or Prof. Collins here? Or Mr. Hunt? The article does actually refer to "Mr. Hunt" twice, not to take away from your point.

> Why are we not talking about Dr. or Prof. Collins here? Or Mr. Hunt? The article does actually refer to "Mr. Hunt" twice, not to take away from your point. People are calling for Dr. Hunt to be reinstated, but also for Dr. Collins too, no doubt? The article does not say either way.