I get what you're saying. And I agree that any company which profits by the uncompensated works of others is wrong. My point is that there are many comments h

I get what you're saying. And I agree that any company which profits by the uncompensated works of others is wrong. My point is that there are many comments here which are along the lines of "string Facebook up on the nearest tree because they allow people to put stuff up which is owned by a content creator who published it on Youtube!!!" The logic being, as you imply, that the content creators on Youtube are not being compensated. And how is that different from Youtube profiting from their users ripping off content creators and putting it up on Youtube? My closing point was that I believe there are better reasons to take the pitchforks and torches out regarding Facebook.