Process names have little to do with actual feature sizes any more. I think 130nm was the last where the name had any correlation to the actual physical dimensi

Process names have little to do with actual feature sizes any more. I think 130nm was the last where the name had any correlation to the actual physical dimensions. (Ex.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/45_nanometer#Example:_Intel.27s_45.C2.A0nm_process https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/45_nanometer#Example:_Intel.27... )