> According to IBM, this could lead to a 50% performance and power boost over chips that are on the market today, effectively keeping Moore’s Law more or less i

> According to IBM, this could lead to a 50% performance and power boost over chips that are on the market today, effectively keeping Moore’s Law more or less intact for the time being. I propose when we finally break the 'law' of Moore's Law, that's when we should say it's not intact. All this "we're at the limit" stuff is just hot air, IMHO. Compute is going to continue to increase at a steady rate and networking is going to lag behind just a little bit less. That's the real mess in all this, not Moore's Law breaking!