Here's another radical thought: Steal intellectual property for one reason and one reason alone: Make as much money as possible. That's what happened in this

Here's another radical thought: Steal intellectual property for one reason and one reason alone: Make as much money as possible. That's what happened in this case. Not very radical, really. "Criminal" seems more apt. > good artists borrow, great artists steal In what deranged interpretation of reality could the stealing pointed out in this article be considered art? Please, do tell.