3 ms·
If that's true, it feels like willful negligence. They have a video platform that has access to a billion people. These are views in the tens of millions. Ther
by joeyaiello 11y ago
If that's true, it feels like willful negligence. They have a video platform that has access to a billion people. These are views in the tens of millions.
There's companies with order of magnitudes less traffic who have people fielding DMCA requests full-time. If FB doesn't, that's completely unacceptable, full stop.
- Swannie 11y agoThe suggestions was the it could be in YouTube's interest to create a team that sends out DMCA notices on the behalf of their top contributors. This would give YouTube a unique feature that would keep their content producers hosting content on their platform. However, the mechanics would be somewhat tricky. I'd guess it would work something like the following: submit a URL for a Facebook post/Wordpress post, that prompted YouTube to ContentID against your existing videos, and if it found a match, it put your flagged violation in a queue for human verification, and subsequent automated DMCA takedown gets sent to the hoster, along with a report of if the content is still available. Of course, that becomes open to the sort of abuse mentioned elsewhere in the thread. FaceBook certainly have a team responding to DMCA requests. They are just slow. Ideally, someone like YouTube licenses their technology, and opens up their contentID DB to the licensee for consumption... But again, I can see many avenues for abuse by licensee's (for example, automated "content capture" of content not currently in the DB), that would need good policies to help prevent.