> You can still inform people about the crime without showing the victims face or the actual explicit imagery. Let's say society makes a fund for people that w

> You can still inform people about the crime without showing the victims face or the actual explicit imagery. Let's say society makes a fund for people that were abused as kids (horribile dictu). Those funds are there only to benefit those people so we'd better be able to prove they were really victims of what they say there were, otherwise people can just say "yeah that happened to me" and collect the money without ever proving they were victims. You may want to forbid people from seeing the evidence for your abuse but then you can't expect people to believe you. When we believe in tales of rape without proof we smear the name of the accused.