This article is horribly written. This isn't about "preventing law enforcement from accessing encryption" it's about not building back doors or using weak encry

This article is horribly written. This isn't about "preventing law enforcement from accessing encryption" it's about not building back doors or using weak encryption that would potentially (or, more accurately, inevitably) allow anyone in. Hearing this kind of nonsense doesn't make me feel less safe because I'm worried about ISIL, it makes me feel less safe because the organization that's supposed to be protecting us is apparently run by an idiot.