3 ms·

Sorry, tech-term-mixup in my brain. I meant AFL-Fuzzed ofcourse. (http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/ http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/)

• moyix 11y ago
  AFL-Fuzz is great, but it isn't going to find everything. Some things I can think of that might make finding this difficult with afl-fuzz: * Flash is a scripting language. It's very hard for a fuzzer with no domain knowledge (like AFL-fuzz) to fuzz language-level constructs, since the vast majority of random inputs are trivially invalid. * Flash is typically embedded in a larger program like a browser; this makes it much more expensive to test (browsers have long startup times, and are very slow when run under the kind of instrumentation needed to detect things like use after free bugs) Unfortunately there's no silver bullet for finding vulnerabilities...
  • SchizoDuckie 11y ago
    While I agree with this, Adobe does have the knowledge and skills to hook a fuzzer into their Flash source on sandboxes and vm's, and basically let a fuzzer rip. When you build one of the most installed pieces of software in the world, you should take that responsibility.
    • kodablah 11y ago
      AFL works from the outside (and even accepts certain keywords to "hint" the fuzzer)...so really anyone could run it against Flash having it generate SWF's. But it'd probably take a really long time to find anything.