4 ms·

$40 per node!

• ende 11y ago
  After 10. So more like $40 per 11 nodes, or $3.6
  • arikfr 11y ago
    But if I have 15, then it's $13.3 per node. And at my work place we have >100, which means >$36 per node. That's a lot.
    • ende 11y ago
      Yes it is.
• ipedrazas 11y ago
  thought the same! Pricing seems a bit Atlassian: almost free if you're small, very expensive if you are not.
  • peteretep 11y ago
    That sounds more like Github's Enterprise product, which used to be a cliff of a few thousand bucks to fall off, where private Bitbucket is a $1/user/month. Maybe Github's pricing is less unusual now.
    • BillinghamJ 11y ago
      Github is still incredibly expensive, for both Enterprise and Github.com.
• pquerna 11y ago
  While $40 per node might sound high, I think it is reasonable. I've worked on several products that are priced per node/server. Per-node a difficult proposition -- the price of "per server" of something varies wildly, for example a t1.micro is roughly $9.50 a month, while a m4.4xlarge is $738. $40 on 9.50 seems extreme, but $40 on $738, and Atlas is only a 5% of the cost of your server. But when your target customer is using high end instances, because they are creating more value for their company that way, a 5% upcharge for better management, can be justified. Mostly its because the team of ops/software engineers supporting production environment are going to cost more than the infrastructure anyways. Additionally, any large deal (>1000 nodes) is gonna get negotiated anyways, so public pricing is kinda a wash.
• lloydde 11y ago
  I appreciate the clear, up front pricing. How does the pricing compare to the competition?