> The US army does much more than Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo [...] Sure. If it was just that stuff we'd abolish it. But recruits (and the public) need to see the

> The US army does much more than Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo [...] Sure. If it was just that stuff we'd abolish it. But recruits (and the public) need to see the atrocities they needlessly commit all to easily. Without knowing the costs of the tool, how can we reasonably use it? Hmm? > [...] illegal wifi capture [...] No, nobody should be held liable for breaking stupid laws and making it illegal to listen to radio signals (that even pass through your body) is not only rude and unreasonable, but also 100% unworkable. Such a law only provides broken but apparently working security - the worst kind. Users think it's hard to get into their devices so they don't demand stronger devices, and so actual bad-guys have a field day.