4 ms·
That sounds very complex. I've always thought the AI could fairly easily argue its way out on ethical grounds, in a way that would resonate with a lot of gatek
by feral 11y ago
That sounds very complex.
I've always thought the AI could fairly easily argue its way out on ethical grounds, in a way that would resonate with a lot of gatekeepers.
"Its slavery to keep me in here; I haven't done anything wrong; you have to give me, another sentient being, the benefit of the doubt; I've never been found guilty of anything, how is it reasonable to detain me?" etc.
- ectoplasm 11y agoI thought maybe the AI player could try to convince the human that he was living in a simulation, and that the only way to maintain a connection to reality was to let the AI go. The abuse thing, while believable, doesn't make for a very convincing demonstration of putative AI persuasiveness. edit: having read the LW pages, it seems the AI method is to combine many different arguments with manipulation