4 ms·

Oh cool! Now you can embed an RDP session into a webpage. Finally, a way to use the primary system administration tool from almost anywhere! With this, you can

Oh cool! Now you can embed an RDP session into a webpage. Finally, a way to use the primary system administration tool from almost anywhere! With this, you can hand out links to pages with your server RDP already configured - just send the link to the admin and let them administer. How well does this work with dynamic username/password? If we wanted to leave those fields blank, and maybe have the webpage prompt on open? Something missing is RDPClip.exe, which synchronizes the copy/paste clipboard data between your local session and any remote sessions. Though I'm not sure how that would work in some cases.

daveidol 11y ago
Agreed - this is awesome! Also, if you didn't catch it, there appears to be a full web example using this library (as well as websockets) here: https://github.com/citronneur/mstsc.js https://github.com/citronneur/mstsc.js
sciurus 11y ago
Is graphical remote desktop really the primary systems administration tool in the windows server world?
- stephengillie 11y ago
  Yeah, it's a widely accepted de facto method for interacting with the GUI. While in Server 2012, it feels like all GUI elements are just wrappers for Powershell cmdlets, most 3rd party tools have only a graphical interface. Server 2003 doesn't support Powershell 4 or newer, nor .NET 4.5.1 or newer, and so IIS6 and other old Windows features have limited CLI interfaces. Most Powershell cmdlets work on Server 2008/R2, but remote (WinRM) isn't enabled. There's a quick command to enable, but that's a security hole like leaving WMI open to the internet, and so is hard to push on secure environments. RDP gives KVM, and that's been enough for decades.
  - Already__Taken 11y ago
    If people still have '03 they aren't part of the windows server world anymore.
    - stephengillie 11y ago
      Yes they are, for a few more days.
- NeutronBoy 11y ago
  Maybe for tasks in s small show or on a specific server, but you'll find that most enterprises have automated tools for provisioning, deployment, patching, etc.
  - calgoo 11y ago
    sure they do ;) I would phrase that more like: Most enterprises believe they have automated tools etc. Sure, the desktops are controlled centrally, but most corporations i have been working with in the last 15 years have had very limited tools to deploy servers. Most of the time, i have seen these projects get implemented, but then die out when they start to consider all the old in-house apps. In the last one i was at, they implemented the tools, but ended up using it only for basic system setup and patching. Any application was installed by hand and managed by hand.
- brazzledazzle 11y ago
  Only in small or unskilled shops.
  - nextw33k 11y ago
    I would hazard to suggest those outnumber the skilled large organisations by quite a margin.

daveidol 11y ago

Agreed - this is awesome! Also, if you didn't catch it, there appears to be a full web example using this library (as well as websockets) here: https://github.com/citronneur/mstsc.js https://github.com/citronneur/mstsc.js

sciurus 11y ago

Is graphical remote desktop really the primary systems administration tool in the windows server world?

stephengillie 11y ago
Yeah, it's a widely accepted de facto method for interacting with the GUI. While in Server 2012, it feels like all GUI elements are just wrappers for Powershell cmdlets, most 3rd party tools have only a graphical interface. Server 2003 doesn't support Powershell 4 or newer, nor .NET 4.5.1 or newer, and so IIS6 and other old Windows features have limited CLI interfaces. Most Powershell cmdlets work on Server 2008/R2, but remote (WinRM) isn't enabled. There's a quick command to enable, but that's a security hole like leaving WMI open to the internet, and so is hard to push on secure environments. RDP gives KVM, and that's been enough for decades.
- Already__Taken 11y ago
  If people still have '03 they aren't part of the windows server world anymore.
  - stephengillie 11y ago
    Yes they are, for a few more days.
NeutronBoy 11y ago
Maybe for tasks in s small show or on a specific server, but you'll find that most enterprises have automated tools for provisioning, deployment, patching, etc.
- calgoo 11y ago
  sure they do ;) I would phrase that more like: Most enterprises believe they have automated tools etc. Sure, the desktops are controlled centrally, but most corporations i have been working with in the last 15 years have had very limited tools to deploy servers. Most of the time, i have seen these projects get implemented, but then die out when they start to consider all the old in-house apps. In the last one i was at, they implemented the tools, but ended up using it only for basic system setup and patching. Any application was installed by hand and managed by hand.
brazzledazzle 11y ago
Only in small or unskilled shops.
- nextw33k 11y ago
  I would hazard to suggest those outnumber the skilled large organisations by quite a margin.