3 ms·
No, it's even older than the FPH banning. It's pure tabloid misogyny, and has been increasing steadily since here appointment. FPH's banning and the Victoria t
by 7Z7 11y ago
No, it's even older than the FPH banning. It's pure tabloid misogyny, and has been increasing steadily since here appointment.
FPH's banning and the Victoria thing have certainly turned up the volume of it, as the hate-squad hold up each new issue (and with the Victoria episode, finally an issue that raised valid concerns) as more proof that they'd been right to harass her for months.
- DCPOS_Anthony 11y ago> It's pure tabloid misogyny, I couldn't care less about Pao. I think the attitude and actions of Ohanian (who is, after all, the person who fired Taylor) has been pretty much the antithesis of helpful during this debacle.
- celticninja 11y agoDo we know for certain that ohanian sacked Victoria?
- celticninja 11y agoReally? If it was around before fph then it was very low key and it would have been because of her lawsuit because prior to fph that was all we really knew about her. But that doesn't mean that the hate was unfounded, her behaviour as portrayed by her own admission at trial, was shitty and as a jury decided she was not discriminated against, she was just a shitty person trying to play the victim card. People didn't want her associated with something (reddit) that they care about. It is nothing to do with misogyny that is just a handy wall to hide behind because she is female. If it was misogyny then why the uproar over a female member of staff being fired? If her accusers were shown to be female it would become a our her race. End of the day she is disliked because of her actions and behaviour, her gender and race have nothing to do with it.