3 ms·
No doubt there are scientific flaws in Fine's work, but even as this article states: "…popular books are written to appeal to a broader audience, and in that r
by lsy 11y ago
No doubt there are scientific flaws in Fine's work, but even as this article states:
"…popular books are written to appeal to a broader audience, and in that respect both Jordan-Young and Fine have succeeded. Prompting laypeople to adopt a more critical view of overly simplistic views of complex data sets is a goal any scientist can support, and for that we applaud their efforts."
The "overly-simplistic views" referenced by the reviewers are exactly the ones approvingly quoted in this article by Psychology Today, and to which Fine is, appropriately, being offered as a counterpoint.