So what you are saying is that people have sex later, thereby there is less sex having, which is exactly what the abstinence teachers want. Then you say higher

So what you are saying is that people have sex later, thereby there is less sex having, which is exactly what the abstinence teachers want. Then you say higher rates of negative outcome, without mentioning whether you consider rate of sex having to be a negative outcome. (I don't disagree with the assessment, it follows the exact logic I posited. I'm not sure why you're taking my comment as being in support of abstinence - it clearly isn't)