3 ms·
I think so. I've heard (and repeated) it many times, and I don't recall ever hearing it disputed. I'd be surprised and embarrassed if it was untrue. https://en
by philh 11y ago
I think so. I've heard (and repeated) it many times, and I don't recall ever hearing it disputed. I'd be surprised and embarrassed if it was untrue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_intelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_intelligenc... says it's controversial near the top. But the citation is a single paper which disagrees, and the rest of the article seems to support the hypothesis.
edit: removed "unpublished"
- hiq 11y agoHow can you tell it is not published? It seemed to me that it had been published in the American psychologist according to [1]. [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16366817 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16366817
- philh 11y agoMy bad. It looks like the link was to a pre-publication draft, but it has indeed since been published.
- xyzzyz 11y agoJust FYI: many papers available onlines are actually preprints/drafts, because the researchers are much freer to distribute them, than the actual published papers bearing journal branding.