6 ms·

Ah, that didn't take long.

Spockulus_Rift 11y ago
what, a jew lover?
Stroganov6198 11y ago
Little tip: Flagging a source (video) that actually documents history and so on, and then lazily assuming it's racist is stupid. It not only strengthens their arguments, but reduces you to a position of censoring real information. A far better way to do it is this: A) 6,000,000 is referenced as 50% of Jewish peoples in Europe in 1915. Why? Source? Where did these papers get this from? B) 6,000,000 is referenced to 50% while claiming that Ukraine / Poland has this number. Why? Is this merely a feature of newspapers at the time, or is this due to bad sourcing? (We know, for a fact, that most of the Shoa occurred here) And so on. Response: A) Take that 6,000,000 figure and map it to the actual numbers in Poland / Ukraine (it's about ~70%) B) Work out why the 6,000,000 was constantly reused. (Hint: bad journalism, lazy sourcing, propaganda from Jewish nationals in the US (GASP Sorry, but really? Of course that's the case) C) Take a deep breath. Even if 6,000,000 people didn't die: it's not a great threat to history to state that a deliberate genocide was enacted that "only" killed 3-4 million people. No, really. If you can't see that 25,000 or 250,000 or 1,400,000 or 4,000,000 are all the same things, then stop. [Note: those are specific figures, to specific groups, without including 'Slavic' nationals just slaughtered post-front action]. There was a list of undesirable humans and that list included many groups. Jews were at the front (in numbers): never pretend that they weren't part of that list, and all were treated the same. ..... ...... ..... .... Family members. And yes: the 1936 "Holocaust" reference is one you really need to deal with. It's Zionist dogma, and nothing to do with the shoa. Yes: propaganda from certain sources can poison the well here - instead of vilifying or banning or flagging sources that hold it, address why and how it happened. Truth does win. You're not on the side of G_D here. You shame G_D by not being honest about that, btw. Politics aside, it just looks weak.
PavlovsCat 11y ago
Stroganov, while I agree with all you said, I think the thing is simply that off-topic stuff gets punished very harshly here, and posts containing only a youtube link are also pretty much a no no (unless it's a reply to a request for that video I guess). Don't take it to heart, it's not the worst system once you get used to it :)
- AhTheDorrs 11y ago
  Hint: That comment was deleted without any access / banning or flagging. That's really depressing: can't deal with good info? Nuke it from orbit. any real hackers on HN should run a mile at that demo (note: logged / screen capped). And, for the reference pile: Jewish. :/ Oh, and PS. Genius move - G_D is about truth. So what religion are you coming from? Hint: it ain't the G_D you're flapping about. 9345sdfshv13w4msh21lhpjahsdaa!34091 Logged. Noted: HN : compromised.
  - AhTheDorrs 11y ago
    And yeah - In reference to the latest hacks of the bad guy Italians, this was a test. YOINK! Nice captcha hellban though (scrummed, it's not solvable) and so on. You are, to be honest, Cunts. Dishonest ones at that ;)

what, a jew lover?

Little tip: Flagging a source (video) that actually documents history and so on, and then lazily assuming it's racist is stupid. It not only strengthens their arguments, but reduces you to a position of censoring real information. A far better way to do it is this: A) 6,000,000 is referenced as 50% of Jewish peoples in Europe in 1915. Why? Source? Where did these papers get this from? B) 6,000,000 is referenced to 50% while claiming that Ukraine / Poland has this number. Why? Is this merely a feature of newspapers at the time, or is this due to bad sourcing? (We know, for a fact, that most of the Shoa occurred here) And so on. Response: A) Take that 6,000,000 figure and map it to the actual numbers in Poland / Ukraine (it's about ~70%) B) Work out why the 6,000,000 was constantly reused. (Hint: bad journalism, lazy sourcing, propaganda from Jewish nationals in the US (GASP Sorry, but really? Of course that's the case) C) Take a deep breath. Even if 6,000,000 people didn't die: it's not a great threat to history to state that a deliberate genocide was enacted that "only" killed 3-4 million people. No, really. If you can't see that 25,000 or 250,000 or 1,400,000 or 4,000,000 are all the same things, then stop. [Note: those are specific figures, to specific groups, without including 'Slavic' nationals just slaughtered post-front action]. There was a list of undesirable humans and that list included many groups. Jews were at the front (in numbers): never pretend that they weren't part of that list, and all were treated the same. ..... ...... ..... .... Family members. And yes: the 1936 "Holocaust" reference is one you really need to deal with. It's Zionist dogma, and nothing to do with the shoa. Yes: propaganda from certain sources can poison the well here - instead of vilifying or banning or flagging sources that hold it, address why and how it happened. Truth does win. You're not on the side of G_D here. You shame G_D by not being honest about that, btw. Politics aside, it just looks weak.

PavlovsCat 11y ago

Stroganov, while I agree with all you said, I think the thing is simply that off-topic stuff gets punished very harshly here, and posts containing only a youtube link are also pretty much a no no (unless it's a reply to a request for that video I guess). Don't take it to heart, it's not the worst system once you get used to it :)

AhTheDorrs 11y ago
Hint: That comment was deleted without any access / banning or flagging. That's really depressing: can't deal with good info? Nuke it from orbit. any real hackers on HN should run a mile at that demo (note: logged / screen capped). And, for the reference pile: Jewish. :/ Oh, and PS. Genius move - G_D is about truth. So what religion are you coming from? Hint: it ain't the G_D you're flapping about. 9345sdfshv13w4msh21lhpjahsdaa!34091 Logged. Noted: HN : compromised.
- AhTheDorrs 11y ago
  And yeah - In reference to the latest hacks of the bad guy Italians, this was a test. YOINK! Nice captcha hellban though (scrummed, it's not solvable) and so on. You are, to be honest, Cunts. Dishonest ones at that ;)