3 ms·
Oh, come on: software is usually much more than a table or a chair. It grows, it needs care, it is more like a plant than something static. What does it even m
by pfortuny 11y ago
Oh, come on: software is usually much more than a table or a chair. It grows, it needs care, it is more like a plant than something static.
What does it even mean to "finish" a program like 'ls' given the increasing complexity of filesystems with time?
- Loque 11y agoI caught myself thinking the same thing, however if you compare software to a physical product the importance of the analogy remains intact. It may not apply to you however, I have been lucky enough to be surrounded by some very well disciplined developers who make a point of finishing a lot of what they start to varying degrees of success.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoThe semantics of POSIX dirents haven't really changed, and any file system complexity is abstracted by the kernel's VFS subsystem to provide generic data in all cases. So, yes, it is possible for something like 'ls' to be finished, or at least for really long times.
- pfortuny 11y agoOk, yes, my example was not the best one. But at the same time, consider things like UTF-8, localization, etc. They appear at the least expected moment and someone has to do something unless the tool becomes useless. I understand you get the idea, though.