2 ms·
There is the implication ... that enough information is presented to get to a solution In general I agree with you. HOWEVER, in this case, one of the choices
by PhantomGremlin 11y ago
There is the implication ... that enough information is presented to get to a solution
In general I agree with you.
HOWEVER, in this case, one of the choices is explicitly "There is not enough information to determine the answer". Given that choice is explicitly presented, it's not a prank. IMO.
- TuringTest 11y agoI agree. In every puzzle there's an element of complexity requiring some lateral thinking, otherwise it wouldn't be puzzling. Playing with the "conventions of the genre", so to say, in order to defy the reader is fair game.
- JadeNB 11y ago> HOWEVER, in this case, one of the choices is explicitly "There is not enough information to determine the answer". Given that choice is explicitly presented, it's not a prank. IMO. That's an interesting perspective, but can it really be that the correct answer to the question depends on the options one is given? That is, would the same puzzle, with that choice deleted, have a different answer?