> If you start treating one member differently, right after other members went through difficult reforms, why should other members then play ball? Yep. We are

> If you start treating one member differently, right after other members went through difficult reforms, why should other members then play ball? Yep. We are talking iterated games and rational expectations here. Something you'd expect an expert in game theory to understand -- which he of course does, leading to the conclusion that he has been very dishonest the whole way through. (I agree with the rest as well.)