> The tone of the article suggests the author is ready to disregard the templated responses from Save Domain Privacy and others. I didn't intend to suggest tha

> The tone of the article suggests the author is ready to disregard the templated responses from Save Domain Privacy and others. I didn't intend to suggest that they be disregard, I just didn't have much to say about them other than their number. Without these efforts to promote opposition, /I/ wouldn't have heard about this proposal I believe. I certainly don't think that the template messages should be ignored just because of their form.