3 ms·
Following your lead: Then let's start by assigning a value to each person killed in WWII and the moral righteousness (or lack thereof) leading to the person's d
by woodpanel 11y ago
Following your lead: Then let's start by assigning a value to each person killed in WWII and the moral righteousness (or lack thereof) leading to the person's death. Yes quite the humane and reasonable trait in a time of total destruction. Very helpful.
Your post actually prove's the other author's point: Your clear opinion of responsibility is shown and thus it would be clear to me, how you as a winner's negotiator in that time after WWII would have "accounted" that debt.
- jsprogrammer 11y agoI'm not sure what you're arguing. Are we going to assign values to each fault of Greece as well and then compare them to your WWII calculation? >Your post actually prove's the other author's point: Your clear opinion of responsibility is shown and thus it would be clear to me, how you as a winner's negotiator in that time after WWII would have "accounted" that debt. My clear "opinion of responsibility"? You mean, my assertion that Germany was responsible for the destruction mentioned by sgnelson and the killing and torturing of millions that I brought up? Do you reject that assertion? Modern debt is an inherently ridiculous proposition. It can only ever expand or collapse. The longer the world tries to solve its problems using it, the more comical it becomes.