3 ms·
It's not useless - it's just limited. "Warmest decade in 160 years" still tells you something. It just doesn't tell you _everything_. As we can never have pe
by AndrewDucker 17y ago
It's not useless - it's just limited.
"Warmest decade in 160 years" still tells you something. It just doesn't tell you _everything_. As we can never have perfect data on everything, learning to take things in context and understand what they are good for (and what they aren't) is a vital skill.
- dantheman 17y agoHere's a great presentation on understanding just how limited the data is: http://web.mit.edu/esi/symposia/symposium-2009/wunsch.html http://web.mit.edu/esi/symposia/symposium-2009/wunsch.html
- bumblebird 17y agoI would have thought though that 160 years when studying climate, is absolutely nothing.