TFA clearly doesn't support your re-written straw man headline, and by comparison: - Kresser: 21 citations to "scientific, unbiased, peer reviewed, modern rese

TFA clearly doesn't support your re-written straw man headline, and by comparison: - Kresser: 21 citations to "scientific, unbiased, peer reviewed, modern research" - NYT OpEd guest writer: naked unsupported assertion that "most of these assertions [about gluten], however, are contradicted by significant evidence" providing no references or scientific discussion Which one is snake oil again? More ironic, the Kresser article does talk about gluten as an auto-immune trigger, making your dismissal seem even more knee-jerk. There are people doing serious work on nutrition, but you won't have much luck finding them in the NYT, much less the OpEd section.