3 ms·
It seems like you managed to completely reverse the findings of the bungee study to match your own expectations... http://m.livescience.com/2117-time-slow-emer
by bostonpete 11y ago
It seems like you managed to completely reverse the findings of the bungee study to match your own expectations...
http://m.livescience.com/2117-time-slow-emergencies.html http://m.livescience.com/2117-time-slow-emergencies.html
"Instead, the scientists found that volunteers could not read the numbers at faster than normal speeds."
- sethammons 11y agoha! wow, thanks for the reality check. I woulda sworn that several people made out the number. well, that is memory for you I guess. going through the link, i like the explanation that you "record" more data over the period of time which in retrospect makes it feel like time slowed.
- qznc 11y agoOk, let's do this right: Research is by David Eagleman [0], who has written about it on the web [1] and originally in: Stetson, Fiesta, Eagleman (2007). Does time really slow down during a frightening event? PLoS One. [2] [0] http://www.eagleman.com/research/time-perception http://www.eagleman.com/research/time-perception [1] http://www.eagleman.com/research/110-time-and-the-brain-or-what-s-happening-in-the-eagleman-lab http://www.eagleman.com/research/110-time-and-the-brain-or-w... [2] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001295 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....