3 ms·
These are false claims and some the entries are downright wrong; for example, FoundationDB was always proprietary. Listing LaunchD and LLVM are also wrong as t
by parasubvert 11y ago
These are false claims and some the entries are downright wrong; for example, FoundationDB was always proprietary.
Listing LaunchD and LLVM are also wrong as they're not "formerly" free, they're still free with communities supporting the free branch. They are code bases that are available under free AND proprietary terms.
What's the point? Public shaming in favor of copyleft? Someone hasn't read their Dale Carnegie.
- soneil 11y agolaunchd is a pretty ironic inclusion as it was developed at apple, by apple, and released under an apache licence. So this "copywrong" would have been "right" if they hadn't open-sourced it at all?