It's a misreading of the situation to suggest that the uproar is over Victoria's firing per se. It was simply the spark that set off dissatisfaction that alread

It's a misreading of the situation to suggest that the uproar is over Victoria's firing per se. It was simply the spark that set off dissatisfaction that already existed about the (perceived) extractive relation that the company has towards its "volunteer" labor. To use a clear topical analogy, people weren't upset about Michael Brown per se to the point of rioting in the streets. His case was just a rallying point for frustrations over perceived systemic police abuse of power.