Anything they say to the press can be used in a discrimination lawsuit. Pao is a lawyer, she knows when to keep her mouth shut to the press. It is better to sa

Anything they say to the press can be used in a discrimination lawsuit. Pao is a lawyer, she knows when to keep her mouth shut to the press. It is better to say she doesn't know why Victoria was fired, than give an actual reason that can be investigated. A CEO that doesn't know what their own organization is doing is a poor CEO, but better to be seen as a poor CEO than one that has a political agenda and fires people based on discrimination principles. Pao needs to be vague so they can't use her words against her in a lawsuit. It is obvious she is trying to clean up Reddit to get better advertisers by banning subs and users and firing people whom she thinks allows certain behavior to go unpunished. I heard that some users were posting links to her husband's Ponzi schemes, and they were getting deleted. http://nypost.com/2015/03/18/users-lash-out-at-reddit-boss-for-deleting-posts-on-hubbys-lawsuit/ http://nypost.com/2015/03/18/users-lash-out-at-reddit-boss-f...