7 ms·

Reddit's CEO Allegedly Fired a Worker for Not Recovering from Cancer Fast Enough

83 points by bennyluo 11y ago

heimatau 11y ago
Can HN not get caught up in the drama of reddit? Please. (Btw, instead of just down voting because you disagree, how about you try to discuss why you think being caught up in the drama is a good thing)
- dang 11y ago
  What's going on at Reddit right now is a significant story, plus HN and Reddit have a long history together (indeed, a common origin). So it's appropriate for the story to be on HN, and it has been: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9822580 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9822580. When it comes to pile-on stories, though, you're right. You're also right that the topic should be discussed here in a substantive way. Generally, any time there's a frenzy of copycat stories, the approach that works best for HN is (a) to settle on (hopefully) the most substantive version of the story for discussion, (b) downweight the follow-ups, and (c) have a new thread if significant new information arises. I don't think the current story passes that last test, though it's perhaps interesting how people are seizing on it.
  - heimatau 11y ago
    This submission isn't contributing to the understanding of the drama. Instead, it's getting caught up in the emotional and herd mentality.
    - dang 11y ago
      My comment agrees with you about this particular submission. I probably should have made that clearer. Btw, the HN rules ask you not to complain about downvotes in comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
      - heimatau 11y ago
        You are correct. I thought the guidelines encouraged discussion instead of down voting but...upon looking at the guidelines, I was wrong. Also, I don't mind the down votes, all I did was ask others to discuss more instead of clicking a simple down vote link. Many can down vote but how many can have a conversation?
- dominotw 11y ago
  No. This is one of the most significant events on the internet today . A first of its kind social phenomenon. This needs to be analyzed like everything else.
  - oldmanjay 11y ago
    it's only first of its kind in a kindred sense to the way many patents were granted by doing an existing process on a computer. protests are not new. the differences here are details. I still find it interesting, though
  - heimatau 11y ago
    Getting caught up in the drama won't add any value to the adolescence nature of reddit. We could posts analysis talking about the details regarding the matters at hand. But this submission is adding fuel to the fire of childish behavior.
    - dominotw 11y ago
      >Getting caught up in the drama > childish behavior You are the one who seems to be caught up on the drama by taking sides .
      - heimatau 11y ago
        No. This submission is clearly smearing one side, the CEO of reddit. This submission is not showing a balanced view of anything. I'm not taking her side nor am I taking the accuser's side. Both are being very emotional and I'd hope that instead of being emotional and pointing fingers, that we'd be a little more mature in the HN community.
- forgotpasswd3x 11y ago
  Nobody is making you click on the submission or view the comments. If this isn't what you want to see on HN, then vote or flag the article, as usual.
  - heimatau 11y ago
    True but I wanted to voice my opinion regarding the submission and the potential dramatic nature that HN could get 'caught up in'. I've been going to HN for about two years now only been a member for a short bit. I want to make my vote. That is all and hopefully communicate with others about it. For the record, I didn't down vote nor flag this but it seems enough of the community did therefore it fell off the front page.
    - yawaramin 11y ago
      A downvote is the voice of your opinion. If you don't have the ability to downvote, well, that should tell you something about whether HN wants your opinion.
      - studentrob 11y ago
        Speaking of the ability to downvote, I've been here over five years and don't have that (@ 81 points). I realize this is correctable and it's on me to comment more, but your comment made me want to add.. I do not participate often because I do not have the ability to contribute my opinion when I want to downvote, and then I get turned off from the discussion thread. Voting is an easy way to keep comment sections concise while allowing everyone to participate. I appreciate concise threads because I'm an engineer and don't want to spend all day rereading the same thoughts in different voices. In short, I want to downvote, I can't, and then I just stop reading and close the thread. I would be happy if I could just push the down arrow and have it contribute, say, negative .2 points, or some amount scaled according to my current points status. I doubt anyone cares enough about users on HN to make such a change, but maybe someone will see this and incorporate it on some future comments board. Thanks for reading.
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
rhino369 11y ago
Pao needs to be replaced. Whether the hate the community at reddit has is justified, it does exist. The company is begging for a reddit clone to pop up and steal the users.
- bane 11y ago
  Her optics at this point are terrible. - CEO of a community-based site where the community doesn't like her (to put it nicely) - Lost a very public lawsuit against a previous employer that revealed quite a bit about her personal and work habits -- and it wasn't exactly glowing, often downright damning. - Tried to recoup legal costs for the lawsuit she started and lost - Was ordered to pay legal costs to her former employer because of the wrongful lawsuit she brought against them - spent most of the first parts of her Executiveship at reddit fooling around with the lawsuit - It's strongly suspected that the damages she claimed in her lawsuit were to cover her husband's financial problems - Her husband appears to be a real piece of work too - Fired a community manager in the middle of a community event, regardless of the reason for firing her, it could have waited. - and now fired a cancer patient On top of these perceptual problems. She also doesn't appear to have any relevant leadership experience for running such a company. It's not like she worked her way up to the top position by starting in the mail room and through moxy and determination worked her way up through the management ranks. She was a lawyer for 2 years, then spent about 3 years in BD/sales, then managed a BD team for a few years and then spent the rest of her time at Kleiner Perkins representing their VC investments before returning back to BD at reddit. Basically she went from a very short career in law, to a career in BD. She has a total of 4 years of any kind of measurable management experience. A transition from BD to CEO is fairly unusual. Somebody previously here on HN said it feels like reddit is being taken over by marketers, it's just as bad, it's being taken over by a Business Developer. What's really going on here is that Ellen is trying to "clean up" reddit to make it more palatable as a strategic partner for other companies to work with. Reddit's wild-west reputation makes it difficult for many companies to work with them. This is what her focus is, probably with the ultimate goal of cleaning up the image for some kind of M&A. This is what BD people care about. Not about the ins and outs of running a company. Reddit should be a much more valuable company, and I have a feeling the board is trying to pivot it into more of a sales channel for corporate partners to pump astroturfed advertisements to and to host special sales events or mod dedicated company/product subs for a fee. There's not much reason to continue to tolerate her at this point except that this is what they want. It's kind of what Digg tried to do, and it may be inevitable for these kinds of narrow margin community-based sites that to start really capitalizing on the community, they go this way. But maybe they're hoping they can make the jump without screwing up as badly as Digg did. It's not looking that way however. > The company is begging for a reddit clone to pop up and steal the users. This has been true for a long time before Pao came on board. It's not really clear what the reddit devs seem to be doing, but empowering the mods to better manage their communities is not one of them. Something like Reddit is not terribly complicated software-wise, the large number of alternate communities (this one included) kind of goes to show it's an understood technology. It's basically a community-in-a-box at this point. The network effects will determine what happens next. As far as these firings go, she can't reverse them. That kills any authority she may still have.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
doe88 11y ago
Assuming this is true. I don't know what it takes to make such a despicable action, this is character defining. There was so many decent alternatives there is no excuses for this behavior.
sp332 11y ago
That emotionally sucks, but the guy hadn't actually done his job for almost a year and still felt entitled to it?
- itg 11y ago
  "During this time, I had sat down with Ellen Pao (current reddit CEO) to discuss my future at reddit and when I was able to move. I had told her that it would still be at least a month (but probably closer to 2 or 3) before I was finally able to move to SF, and she said she was 100% fine with that. We discussed my position, and ultimately determined that I would be returning to the Community Management team. I met some of the new members of the team, all was well, and then I flew home on day 3."
claudiug 11y ago
is possible in USA to get fired with no procedures, or not getting any money?
- dragonwriter 11y ago
  Yes. Most of the US is employment-at-will by default, which means that you can legally be fired without cause, notice, or compensation other than that due based on work prior to the moment of termination. (Now, there are still reasons for which it is illegal to fire people, and, in part to avoid disputes over whether one of those were involved -- and, on the procedural end, in part to actually work to resolve issues that might be resolved short of firing -- employers will often apply substantial procedures before firing, and even when firing offer a severance package, potentially explicitly contingent on an agreement not to sue.)
  - iofj 11y ago
    It baffles me that it is legal to offer somebody anything "contingent on an agreement not to sue". How are disputes resolved ? Especially in this case there is almost a guarantee of a dispute, isn't there. How would an employer defend that this agreement wasn't made under duress ? That both sides were equal partners in the negotiation about such a contract ? I'd think the right to sue about anything is the most fundamental of the inalienable rights, because without it, the other rights wouldn't effectively exist.
    - CyberDildonics 11y ago
      When leaving a company they can't make you sign something, because no one can make you sign something. But of course they can give something in exchange for signing something. You can think of it as a mini settlement. I don't think it is great, because many people will just sign things thinking they have no choice, and the timing and mechanics of how these things happen are often used against people. I've had exit contracts given to me. They were full of things that benefited the company and had nothing that benefited me. I said 'There's no benefit to me signing this, what do I get if I do?' They didn't offer me anything, so I didn't sign.
paulhauggis 11y ago
"In early 2012, he was supposed to move to San Francisco when he was diagnosed with Leukemia." "Fortunately, reddit’s then-CEO, Yishan Wong, allowed him to keep his job and continued paying him until he was ready to work again" So he worked for the company from 2012-2015..3 years. It sounds like at least a year of this was spent in and out of the hospital and he continued to get paid. It's not like he was fired on the spot. Reddit gave him plenty of recovery time..and it just didn't work out in the end. I see no problem with what they did. "Victoria (aka /u/chooter) was, without question, one of the nicest, most passionate, most efficient workers at reddit, and I honestly can’t fathom why she would have been terminated. It was such an honor to work with her, and as many mods have already stated, she truly took her work to heart and tried to provide a service to the community. She was one of the most well-known admins and was just incredible at her job. Without her, there would be hundreds of incredible AMAs that would have never happened." We only see one-side of the story. Why was she let go? We still don't know.
- georgemcbay 11y ago
  The fact that we only know one-side of the story* is actually the biggest "wtf?" in all of this, in my opinion. That the reddit executive staff hasn't really addressed this entire shitstorm publicly and officially by now is absolutely mind-boggling given what reddit is. They are giving the impression that they still see this just as a conversation between mods and admins and are basically ignoring the public spill-over (except for Alexis' dismissive comments). *(really we know less than one side of the story since AFAIK Victoria hasn't really talked about it publicly, which from her side is totally understandable for either legal [if severance is involved] or just not wanting to get blackballed reasons).
  - dogma1138 11y ago
    Do you really think that any legal department would allow anyone to comment in such case? Anything they say might lead to a law suit, in such cases if they comment on anything it will be in the form of the most anemic press release possible with every fact checked about 10000 times before hand.
lcswi 11y ago
Submitted site adds pretty much nothing to the original source: https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3c0idl/i_am_dacvak_former_reddit_employee_and_leukemia/ https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3c0idl/i_am_dacvak_fo...
- dang 11y ago
  Thanks. URL changed to that from http://nextshark.com/ellen-pao-reddit-dacvak-ama/ http://nextshark.com/ellen-pao-reddit-dacvak-ama/.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]

83 points by bennyluo 11y ago

Can HN not get caught up in the drama of reddit? Please. (Btw, instead of just down voting because you disagree, how about you try to discuss why you think being caught up in the drama is a good thing)

dang 11y ago
What's going on at Reddit right now is a significant story, plus HN and Reddit have a long history together (indeed, a common origin). So it's appropriate for the story to be on HN, and it has been: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9822580 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9822580. When it comes to pile-on stories, though, you're right. You're also right that the topic should be discussed here in a substantive way. Generally, any time there's a frenzy of copycat stories, the approach that works best for HN is (a) to settle on (hopefully) the most substantive version of the story for discussion, (b) downweight the follow-ups, and (c) have a new thread if significant new information arises. I don't think the current story passes that last test, though it's perhaps interesting how people are seizing on it.
- heimatau 11y ago
  This submission isn't contributing to the understanding of the drama. Instead, it's getting caught up in the emotional and herd mentality.
  - dang 11y ago
    My comment agrees with you about this particular submission. I probably should have made that clearer. Btw, the HN rules ask you not to complain about downvotes in comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
    - heimatau 11y ago
      You are correct. I thought the guidelines encouraged discussion instead of down voting but...upon looking at the guidelines, I was wrong. Also, I don't mind the down votes, all I did was ask others to discuss more instead of clicking a simple down vote link. Many can down vote but how many can have a conversation?
dominotw 11y ago
No. This is one of the most significant events on the internet today . A first of its kind social phenomenon. This needs to be analyzed like everything else.
- oldmanjay 11y ago
  it's only first of its kind in a kindred sense to the way many patents were granted by doing an existing process on a computer. protests are not new. the differences here are details. I still find it interesting, though
- heimatau 11y ago
  Getting caught up in the drama won't add any value to the adolescence nature of reddit. We could posts analysis talking about the details regarding the matters at hand. But this submission is adding fuel to the fire of childish behavior.
  - dominotw 11y ago
    >Getting caught up in the drama > childish behavior You are the one who seems to be caught up on the drama by taking sides .
    - heimatau 11y ago
      No. This submission is clearly smearing one side, the CEO of reddit. This submission is not showing a balanced view of anything. I'm not taking her side nor am I taking the accuser's side. Both are being very emotional and I'd hope that instead of being emotional and pointing fingers, that we'd be a little more mature in the HN community.
forgotpasswd3x 11y ago
Nobody is making you click on the submission or view the comments. If this isn't what you want to see on HN, then vote or flag the article, as usual.
- heimatau 11y ago
  True but I wanted to voice my opinion regarding the submission and the potential dramatic nature that HN could get 'caught up in'. I've been going to HN for about two years now only been a member for a short bit. I want to make my vote. That is all and hopefully communicate with others about it. For the record, I didn't down vote nor flag this but it seems enough of the community did therefore it fell off the front page.
  - yawaramin 11y ago
    A downvote is the voice of your opinion. If you don't have the ability to downvote, well, that should tell you something about whether HN wants your opinion.
    - studentrob 11y ago
      Speaking of the ability to downvote, I've been here over five years and don't have that (@ 81 points). I realize this is correctable and it's on me to comment more, but your comment made me want to add.. I do not participate often because I do not have the ability to contribute my opinion when I want to downvote, and then I get turned off from the discussion thread. Voting is an easy way to keep comment sections concise while allowing everyone to participate. I appreciate concise threads because I'm an engineer and don't want to spend all day rereading the same thoughts in different voices. In short, I want to downvote, I can't, and then I just stop reading and close the thread. I would be happy if I could just push the down arrow and have it contribute, say, negative .2 points, or some amount scaled according to my current points status. I doubt anyone cares enough about users on HN to make such a change, but maybe someone will see this and incorporate it on some future comments board. Thanks for reading.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]

rhino369 11y ago

Pao needs to be replaced. Whether the hate the community at reddit has is justified, it does exist. The company is begging for a reddit clone to pop up and steal the users.

bane 11y ago
Her optics at this point are terrible. - CEO of a community-based site where the community doesn't like her (to put it nicely) - Lost a very public lawsuit against a previous employer that revealed quite a bit about her personal and work habits -- and it wasn't exactly glowing, often downright damning. - Tried to recoup legal costs for the lawsuit she started and lost - Was ordered to pay legal costs to her former employer because of the wrongful lawsuit she brought against them - spent most of the first parts of her Executiveship at reddit fooling around with the lawsuit - It's strongly suspected that the damages she claimed in her lawsuit were to cover her husband's financial problems - Her husband appears to be a real piece of work too - Fired a community manager in the middle of a community event, regardless of the reason for firing her, it could have waited. - and now fired a cancer patient On top of these perceptual problems. She also doesn't appear to have any relevant leadership experience for running such a company. It's not like she worked her way up to the top position by starting in the mail room and through moxy and determination worked her way up through the management ranks. She was a lawyer for 2 years, then spent about 3 years in BD/sales, then managed a BD team for a few years and then spent the rest of her time at Kleiner Perkins representing their VC investments before returning back to BD at reddit. Basically she went from a very short career in law, to a career in BD. She has a total of 4 years of any kind of measurable management experience. A transition from BD to CEO is fairly unusual. Somebody previously here on HN said it feels like reddit is being taken over by marketers, it's just as bad, it's being taken over by a Business Developer. What's really going on here is that Ellen is trying to "clean up" reddit to make it more palatable as a strategic partner for other companies to work with. Reddit's wild-west reputation makes it difficult for many companies to work with them. This is what her focus is, probably with the ultimate goal of cleaning up the image for some kind of M&A. This is what BD people care about. Not about the ins and outs of running a company. Reddit should be a much more valuable company, and I have a feeling the board is trying to pivot it into more of a sales channel for corporate partners to pump astroturfed advertisements to and to host special sales events or mod dedicated company/product subs for a fee. There's not much reason to continue to tolerate her at this point except that this is what they want. It's kind of what Digg tried to do, and it may be inevitable for these kinds of narrow margin community-based sites that to start really capitalizing on the community, they go this way. But maybe they're hoping they can make the jump without screwing up as badly as Digg did. It's not looking that way however. > The company is begging for a reddit clone to pop up and steal the users. This has been true for a long time before Pao came on board. It's not really clear what the reddit devs seem to be doing, but empowering the mods to better manage their communities is not one of them. Something like Reddit is not terribly complicated software-wise, the large number of alternate communities (this one included) kind of goes to show it's an understood technology. It's basically a community-in-a-box at this point. The network effects will determine what happens next. As far as these firings go, she can't reverse them. That kills any authority she may still have.

deleted 11y ago

[deleted]

doe88 11y ago

Assuming this is true. I don't know what it takes to make such a despicable action, this is character defining. There was so many decent alternatives there is no excuses for this behavior.

sp332 11y ago

That emotionally sucks, but the guy hadn't actually done his job for almost a year and still felt entitled to it?

itg 11y ago
"During this time, I had sat down with Ellen Pao (current reddit CEO) to discuss my future at reddit and when I was able to move. I had told her that it would still be at least a month (but probably closer to 2 or 3) before I was finally able to move to SF, and she said she was 100% fine with that. We discussed my position, and ultimately determined that I would be returning to the Community Management team. I met some of the new members of the team, all was well, and then I flew home on day 3."

claudiug 11y ago

is possible in USA to get fired with no procedures, or not getting any money?

dragonwriter 11y ago
Yes. Most of the US is employment-at-will by default, which means that you can legally be fired without cause, notice, or compensation other than that due based on work prior to the moment of termination. (Now, there are still reasons for which it is illegal to fire people, and, in part to avoid disputes over whether one of those were involved -- and, on the procedural end, in part to actually work to resolve issues that might be resolved short of firing -- employers will often apply substantial procedures before firing, and even when firing offer a severance package, potentially explicitly contingent on an agreement not to sue.)
- iofj 11y ago
  It baffles me that it is legal to offer somebody anything "contingent on an agreement not to sue". How are disputes resolved ? Especially in this case there is almost a guarantee of a dispute, isn't there. How would an employer defend that this agreement wasn't made under duress ? That both sides were equal partners in the negotiation about such a contract ? I'd think the right to sue about anything is the most fundamental of the inalienable rights, because without it, the other rights wouldn't effectively exist.
  - CyberDildonics 11y ago
    When leaving a company they can't make you sign something, because no one can make you sign something. But of course they can give something in exchange for signing something. You can think of it as a mini settlement. I don't think it is great, because many people will just sign things thinking they have no choice, and the timing and mechanics of how these things happen are often used against people. I've had exit contracts given to me. They were full of things that benefited the company and had nothing that benefited me. I said 'There's no benefit to me signing this, what do I get if I do?' They didn't offer me anything, so I didn't sign.

paulhauggis 11y ago

"In early 2012, he was supposed to move to San Francisco when he was diagnosed with Leukemia." "Fortunately, reddit’s then-CEO, Yishan Wong, allowed him to keep his job and continued paying him until he was ready to work again" So he worked for the company from 2012-2015..3 years. It sounds like at least a year of this was spent in and out of the hospital and he continued to get paid. It's not like he was fired on the spot. Reddit gave him plenty of recovery time..and it just didn't work out in the end. I see no problem with what they did. "Victoria (aka /u/chooter) was, without question, one of the nicest, most passionate, most efficient workers at reddit, and I honestly can’t fathom why she would have been terminated. It was such an honor to work with her, and as many mods have already stated, she truly took her work to heart and tried to provide a service to the community. She was one of the most well-known admins and was just incredible at her job. Without her, there would be hundreds of incredible AMAs that would have never happened." We only see one-side of the story. Why was she let go? We still don't know.

georgemcbay 11y ago
The fact that we only know one-side of the story* is actually the biggest "wtf?" in all of this, in my opinion. That the reddit executive staff hasn't really addressed this entire shitstorm publicly and officially by now is absolutely mind-boggling given what reddit is. They are giving the impression that they still see this just as a conversation between mods and admins and are basically ignoring the public spill-over (except for Alexis' dismissive comments). *(really we know less than one side of the story since AFAIK Victoria hasn't really talked about it publicly, which from her side is totally understandable for either legal [if severance is involved] or just not wanting to get blackballed reasons).
- dogma1138 11y ago
  Do you really think that any legal department would allow anyone to comment in such case? Anything they say might lead to a law suit, in such cases if they comment on anything it will be in the form of the most anemic press release possible with every fact checked about 10000 times before hand.

lcswi 11y ago

Submitted site adds pretty much nothing to the original source: https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3c0idl/i_am_dacvak_former_reddit_employee_and_leukemia/ https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3c0idl/i_am_dacvak_fo...

dang 11y ago
Thanks. URL changed to that from http://nextshark.com/ellen-pao-reddit-dacvak-ama/ http://nextshark.com/ellen-pao-reddit-dacvak-ama/.

deleted 11y ago

[deleted]