3 ms·
This. As always, there's a relevant xkcd[1]. Features that I might decry as bloat are probably someone else's "necessary, to be preserved at all costs" features
by omegaham 11y ago
This. As always, there's a relevant xkcd[1]. Features that I might decry as bloat are probably someone else's "necessary, to be preserved at all costs" features. If you want to cover a large number of use cases, you have to include all of them. And with that comes bloat. There's a reason why even a minimalist CLI-only Linux installation requires more than 24MB of RAM when Windows 3.1 runs on 3MB - the Linux kernel is capable of a hell of a lot more.
[1]https://xkcd.com/1172/ https://xkcd.com/1172/
- kazinator 11y agoA minimalist CLI-only Linux installation was still possible in around in 2 megs of RAM in 1994. A minimalist XWindow installation was possible with a 40 megabyte hard drive and 4 megs of RAM over a 386 CPU. (That's similar specs to what 68K-based Sun workstations had perhaps a decade before that.)