>Perhaps you can enlighten me as to why you think this is bad. You can't see why a Google lawyer would think it 'bad' for a temporary member of staff to be abl

>Perhaps you can enlighten me as to why you think this is bad. You can't see why a Google lawyer would think it 'bad' for a temporary member of staff to be able to receive the full source (with licence to use and redistribute) for Google search, adwords, gmail etc etc?