3 ms·
That's... interesting. I guess it makes a little sense -- `let` seems to be for developers who don't like `var` semantics. Usually that seems to be about wantin
by wwweston 11y ago
That's... interesting. I guess it makes a little sense -- `let` seems to be for developers who don't like `var` semantics. Usually that seems to be about wanting block instead of function scope, but maybe there's a contingent that dislikes `undefined` too.
- masklinn 11y ago`let` doesn't disappear `undefined` though. >> let a; >> a; undefined