4 ms·
You could have your temps and employees waive their rights under the AGPLv3 as a condition of their employment, contract, etc. Most legit AGPL projects I've se
by bcg1 11y ago
You could have your temps and employees waive their rights under the AGPLv3 as a condition of their employment, contract, etc.
Most legit AGPL projects I've seen by the way don't really try to trap you like that anyhow... for instance, you can re-theme mediagoblin etc. And if you're going to hack on the core... would it really be so bad to upstream the code?
- detaro 11y ago> for instance, you can re-theme mediagoblin etc. Is that tested in court? Because that was one of the scenarios described as potentially problematic before to me by a lawyer (Applying a corporate theme to an AGPL system, breaching the contract with the designer of the theme that doesn't allow you to re-license the design, only to use it)
- belorn 11y agoThere doesn't seem to be a court case that defined if images should count as part of the work or not when talking about licenses. Many AGPL projects clarify their intention and exclude css, images and styling regarding agpl compliance. At this point it could almost be said to be a industry practice. Outside software, there doesn't seem to be a clear legal precedence either. I commonly see news paper include CC-share-alike images in articles without adding the CC license to the article, website or the news paper itself. The question about copyright almost exclusively end up being about distribution rights of the work in isolation, or the right of the author to have the work associated in a specific context.